DSLR vs. Point-and-Shoot for Travel

Ducking in and out of the ruins of Angkor Wat, I find myself weaving through throngs of tourists to find a spot to snap that perfect photo. It’s a scenario that I have negotiated countless times.

While the essence of my travels and the desire to get the perfect shot has always remained the same, a noticeable change in photo gear has taken place in just the past few years.  Wrist straps dangling discrete point-and-shoot cameras have given way to neck straps holding bulky DSLR cameras, displaying Canon or Nikon logos, as the common sight when traveling.

I’ve made the migration to DSLR from point-and-shoot myself and haven’t looked back.  But, what makes a larger DSLR camera and the gift of neck and back strain (I say this from personal experience) preferable to the convenient pack-of-gum sized point-and-shoots?  The simple answer – they take better photos.  The more complex answer requires looking at the following several camera factors in which even most basic DSLRs outperform point-and-shoots:

Sensor Size

A camera’s sensor size affects the quality of your snapshots.  Point-and-shoots are equipped with small sensors.  Smaller sensors are unable to capture as much light and produce images with less optical quality than the larger sensors found in DSLR cameras.

Greater Shutter Speed Range

Shutter speed, the amount of time the camera’s shutter remains open to expose light to the sensor, is your primary means for controlling the exposure time of your photos.

DSLR cameras have a greater shutter speed range than point-and-shoot cameras.  This provides more control over effects such as freezing time (fast shutter for a quick exposure) or capturing a longer time-frame (slow shutter for a long exposure.)

Better ISO Range

Dave Johnson, a renowned wildlife photographer and author of PC World’s weekly newsletter, Digital Focus, refers to photography as “painting with light.”  This underscores the importance of light on the images you produce with your camera.

Your camera’s ISO settings adjust the sensitivity of your camera’s sensor to light.  In general, if there’s a lot of light, you’ll want to dial the ISO setting down. If there is less light, you dial the ISO setting up.  The trade off with higher ISO settings is that while you’re squeezing out more light onto the sensor, you’re increasing the graininess, or noise, of the photo.

DSLRs have a better ISO sensitivity range than point-and-shoot cameras.  This permits better control of these noise levels in your photo and maximizes your use of natural light, which in most situations is better than relying on flash.

Harder Working Megapixels

Point-and-shoot camera manufacturers are pitted against each other in an all-out megapixel war. Unfortunately, the general public misconstrues the megapixel rating as the primary benchmark of camera quality.  This is no surprise! Strolling the point-and-shoot aisles at the electronics store, you’ll notice the megapixel rating as the most prominent specification on the box.  What you may not know is that not all megapixels are created equal.

Let’s take a DSLR and a point-and-shoot camera and assume that both have 10 megapixel capability.  Imagine the sensors in each camera as tables with 10 megapixels worth of cups sitting on the table.  The DSLR has a larger table and as a result, larger cups which capture more light for better image quality.

The equivalent pixel on a DSLR is of much higher quality than on a point-and shoot.  On top of that, point-and-shoot cameras, with tons of megapixels crammed onto small sensors, often create a lot of image noise.  You’ve probably seen it before – smartphone and point-and-shoot photos that have a grainy texture, despite having a high megapixel rating.

Canon Rebel T1i DSLR (Left) vs. Canon SD1400 Point-and-Shoot (Right.) Shot at 100 ISO, F/2.8, 1/125. Note the pronounced noise with the point-and-shoot.

Interchangeable Lenses, Hot Shoe and Accessories

While there are new point-and-shoots on the market that allow you to change lenses, the vast majority of models have built-in lenses that are not removable.  With a DSLR, the usefulness of the camera for different types of shooting scenarios is greatly expanded due to the large numbers of lenses available, especially for Canon and Nikon cameras.

DSLR cameras, like film SLR cameras, also have a mounting adapter at the top of the body called a hot shoe.  The hot shoe allows you to connect a number of devices to the camera, like an external flash.

The Verdict

There is no question that DSLR cameras produce superior images over point-and-shoot cameras.  There’s also no question that DSLR cameras are more cumbersome to tote along when traveling.  For me personally, the load isn’t getting any lighter!  The further I wade into the waters of serious photography, the more camera gear I accumulate.  My gear collection now includes 3 lenses (a wide angle, a medium telephoto and 50mm portrait lens), a Canon 5D Mark II full frame camera, a small Canon external flash and a tripod.  Admittedly, travel has become more challenging since I prefer to avoid checking in bags at all costs!

Despite all of the inconveniences, ownership of a DSLR has improved the quality of our travel photos. The photographs of our trips are among the most important tributes to our experiences.  Our DSLR has helped us capture the essence and clarity of the sights we see with greater accuracy.  This alone, makes the inconveniences, including the occasional sore neck and shoulder pain, all the worthwhile.

My friend, Bill, lining up a shot with his DSLR in Morocco

Recommended Starting Point

If you’ve decided to take the DSLR plunge, I would recommend going with an entry level option from either of the big two DSLR producers – Canon or Nikon. There are other camera manufacturers that produce quality products, but none can match the support, available accessories and lens selection of Canon and Nikon. I’ve always shot with a Canon, so my bias is toward the Canon product line.

I began my DSLR experience several years ago with Canon’s then-entry level EOS Rebel T1i.  It’s a great DSLR setup that is accommodating for beginners and has enough juice to support photographers who have graduated into the realm of manually controlling exposure, aperture, ISO and all of the other settings that affect the creative output of their images.  In addition, the Rebel is fairly light and weighs in at only 1.14lbs.

Entry Level Canon Recommendation:

2 Comments on “DSLR vs. Point-and-Shoot for Travel

  1. I am curious your thoughts on the new hybrid cameras, like the Nikon 1. We have a DSLR and a point and shoot and travel with both. I am finding myself going about town most days with the point and shoot, and if we are doing a big picture day, we will take the DSLR. The Nikon 1 seems to be the best of both worlds, but not sure if we are ready to take the plunge. Thoughts?

  2. Hi Amber,

    We’re in the same boat as you. We travel with both our DSLR (along with a slew of lenses) and our trusty Canon point-and-shoot. As you know, there are some locations where a $3,000 full-frame DSLR body and nearly $3,500 worth of lenses hanging off your neck is asking for trouble, or just simply isn’t the most comfortable arrangement.

    There’s no question that new hybrids, like the Nikon 1 and Sony NEX line, have better optics (larger sensor, better light handling capability, swappable lenses, etc.) than the typical point-and-shoot. On top of that, they aren’t that much larger.

    Bottom-line, the photo output on hybrids, as I’ve seen from some of my own limited testing, is much better than on my Canon SD600. I would love to upgrade our point-and-shoot to a hybrid so we have better equipment on days we give the DSLR a rest.

    The only issue for us is the cost. After investing so much in our DSLR setup, spending money on a hybrid is a stretch given that you’re likely going to want to buy lenses for it. My other worry is longevity of the investment. For example, lenses for the Nikon 1 will only work with the Nikon 1. It’s not entirely clear what sort of backwards-compatibility Nikon (or Sony) has planned for these small hybrid lenses as they upgrade the hybrid model lines moving forward.

    In short, I may very consider the upgrade at a later date, but I’d like to see what happens with compatibility of lenses once the next generation of hybrids comes out.

    Loving your blog and looking forward to reading about your and Eric’s adventures!

Leave a Reply